Table of Contents Andrew Tate’s trading year went from risky to ruinous. Data shared on X paints a clear picture of heavy crypto losses, stacked across leveraged bets gone wrong. The former kickboxer turned influencer reportedly lost over $700,000 trading digital assets in 2025. Most of it came from his aggressive Ethereum positions, where high leverage compounded the fall. The losses, all confirmed onchain, add another chapter to Tate’s turbulent run in the crypto market. According to onchain data cited by @StarPlatinumSOL, Tate made over 80 leveraged trades this year, spanning major tokens like ETH, BTC, and WLFI. Out of these, only 29 were profitable, giving him a 35.5% win rate. Andrew Tate keeps proving he’s one of the worst traders in crypto. Onchain data confirms Tate lost around $700,000 in 2025 with a 35.5% win rate (29 of 80 trades). His biggest losses: $597K in ETH, $93K in BTC, and $67.5K in WLFI Verified Wallets: Main Wallet – Hyperliquid… pic.twitter.com/miMLjTWXEX — StarPlatinum (@StarPlatinumSOL) October 17, 2025 The biggest hit came in June when Tate went long on Ethereum at around $2,515 using 25x leverage. That position alone cost him roughly $597,000 after liquidation. Data also showed smaller but costly losses in Bitcoin and meme tokens through similar leveraged plays. His Hyperliquid wallet, identified as 0xB78D97390a96A17Fd2B58FeDBEB3DD876c8F660A, remains active with around $124,000 in assets. The same wallet logged a total onchain PnL of negative $671,000, based on data shared publicly. Tate’s pattern of high-risk entries mirrors other traders who chase volatility for quick gains. However, his repeated use of heavy leverage amplified each downturn, leaving little margin for error. Arkham’s confirmed data also linked Tate to a Solana wallet holding over 5.75 million DADDY tokens, valued around $132,000. The wallet also contained 231 SOL, worth roughly $42,000. That address, 4jRX4iW2F5wBnfYMyB7RjS2PU5MjXrST3fB9DoV4BjHa, shows more than 1,200 transactions, most tied to meme coins. These activity logs suggest a shift from leveraged majors to speculative trading. Tate’s other losses included $93,000 from a 40x Bitcoin long in October and $67,500 from a WLFI position in September. Each trade was fully traceable onchain, confirming their authenticity and scale. Across 2025, Tate’s trading profile reads more like a series of risky experiments than a structured strategy. His crypto exposure remains public, leaving traders to track what comes next.