H.R. 5166 directs the U.S. Treasury to explore a Strategic Bitcoin Reserve and Digital Asset Stockpile. The Treasury will assess the feasibility of storing Bitcoin and digital assets for national security and financial stability. The bill reflects growing congressional interest in integrating digital assets into U.S. fiscal policy. The United States House of Representatives has proposed an appropriation that contains the exploration of a Strategic Bitcoin Reserve and a U.S. Digital Asset Stockpile. Representative Joyce, of Ohio, of the Committee on Appropriations, reported the bill, H.R. 5166, on September 5, 2025, and placed it on the Union Calendar. It is included in the financial services and general government appropriations to the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026. Source: X The legislative bill instructs the U.S. Treasury to investigate the possibility of storing Bitcoin and other digital currencies in the reserves of the country. In case the move is enacted, it would be a significant step towards harmonising federal financial policy with the trends in the digital asset markets. H.R. 5166 is the part of a number of annual spending bills allocating federal funds in financial services and government operations. Although the bulk of the provisions is often concerned with the usual funding of agencies and programs, the presence of a language on Bitcoin and digital assets is an indication that there is a conscious effort to incorporate new financial tools into long-term policy. The fact that the Committee on Appropriations has been involved shows that the proposal has already moved beyond first draft preparation and is well supported to be put on the Union Calendar where bills are to be debated on the floor. The mentioning of a Strategic Bitcoin Reserve and a Digital Asset Stockpile highlights the increased acceptance of cryptocurrencies as an emerging component of the financial system. Strategic Bitcoin Reserve Concept and Drivers. The Strategic Bitcoin Reserve, which will be described as part of the legislative discussions, would be similar to the set-up of the classical reserve assets of gold or foreign currencies. The United States treasury would be mandated to research the possible option of acquisition, custody, and the economic conditions of holding Bitcoin in the national reserves. The bill mentions the establishment of a U.S. Digital Asset Stockpile along with the Strategic Bitcoin Reserve. This wider scope would not only cover Bitcoin but also other blockchain-based assets that might be considered having strategic importance. The stockpile initiative would enable the Treasury to evaluate how different digital assets would support financial stability, technology competitiveness, and national security. It also means that structures to secure storage, auditing and even utilization of these assets in situations with national interests will be set. The interest of Congress in Bitcoin and digital assets has vitalized in the last decade. A few reasons seem to have pushed this language into the text of H.R. 5166:The increasing use of Bitcoin as a reserve currency by corporations, creating doubts about whether sovereign nations ought to consider the same approach. An increase in the number of corporate treasury holdings in Bitcoin and other digital assets, which raises the question of whether the governments of sovereign states should follow suit. Growing legislative efforts on digital asset regulation, including bipartisan legislation to shed light on market structure and tax policy. There is a wave of Congressional interest behind the bill to consider digital assets not as market instruments, but as elements of national economic resilience. Development of the Initiative and Legislative Process During recent sittings, congressional representatives complained about the country lagging behind in the adoption of digital assets. Witnesses such as financial regulators, business leaders, and scholars added to a corpus of evidence that points to the risks that are posed by the cryptocurrencies as well as the opportunities they offer. Parallel to this, the geopolitical processes in which reserve currencies are involved, such as diversification of emerging economies, drew the Bitcoin into a clearer perspective. Related bills introduced in earlier sessions but not passed, however, preconditioned the appearance of concrete language on the topic in the current appropriations bill of this year. The Treasury Department would be at the center of implementation of the suggested initiatives. Some of its mandates would be to carry out an in-depth research on the ramifications of owning and holding a reserve of Bitcoin, analyzing technological controls to custody and the creation of reporting tools to Congress. In the case of Digital Asset Stockpile, the Treasury would require establishing asset selection criteria, whether to procure or produce assets, and incorporate controls to ensure transparency and accountability. H.R. 5166 has passed through the House and been laid upon the Union Calendar but it has to pass through a series of steps before it will be enacted into law. Flooring debates, potential amendments and Senate debates are yet to come. In case the measure is passed through both houses of the congress, it will need the signature of the President in order to be enacted. The insertion of provisions regarding digital assets into an appropriations bill is a strange yet noteworthy move to place the topic in a larger framework of government funding and budgeting. The bill is presented at a time of increased digital asset regulation activity in Congress. Over recent months, Congress has been weighing bills that focus on stablecoins, anti-money laundering compliance and market structure reforms. These efforts combined with each other are an indication of a broad-based federal approach emerging. Placing the Strategic Bitcoin Reserve and Digital Asset Stockpile within an appropriations context, legislators have made it possible to associate the policy on digital assets with long-term fiscal management, which may have an effect on future budgetary cycles. Industry and Market Reactions The bill has yet to be passed but already its reporting has attracted the interest of digital asset markets. Analysts observe that the consideration of Bitcoin as a possible reserve asset by congress is a step in the mainstreaming of cryptocurrency debate within the federal government. Source : X The volatility of digital asset markets has highlighted the need to have clear guidelines on custody, security and valuation that need to be adopted by industry players. These complexities have been acknowledged by focusing on Treasury-led studies. The initiative may become a turning point in the U.S. financial policy in case it is adopted because it will make digital assets part of the national reserves. Creation of Strategic Bitcoin Reserve would put the United States on par with an increasing number of jurisdictions that are contemplating such actions. The Digital Asset Stockpile would bring such recognition to a broader range of blockchain innovations and possibly solidify American leadership in financial technology. An attempt to develop resilience in future financial shocks due to diversification of reserve strategies is also an indication of the bill. The fact that Congress is asking the Treasury to consider such actions is predetermining more responsible decision-making in future fiscal years.