Corporate balance sheets are going crypto. In 2025, a record number of firms have disclosed holdings of Bitcoin, Ether, and other cryptocurrencies. Currently, 161 publicly listed companies across the globe follow a Bitcoin treasury strategy. Combined together, these companies hold over 1 million BTC. That’s 4.97% of all available Bitcoin. Corporate crypto treasuries hold over $112  billion in net value, a rise of about 628.3% from $15.38 billion within one year. That’s a seismic change in how companies manage excess cash. For finance teams accustomed to parking cash in banks and Treasuries, swapping some of that pile for crypto is suddenly an attractive option. Why does this matter so much for the crypto space? It matters because corporate treasuries are the most conservative pools of capital in the market. When CFOs, audit committees, and Big Four sign-offs green-light digital assets, it shows that crypto has passed the phase of being interesting to legitimate reserves. This forces traditional financial and consulting entities to meet higher standards of custody, reporting, and controls. It deepens liquidity across the crypto space and broadens the holder base beyond funds and retail investors, reducing tail-risk over time. It also sets a powerful peer benchmark. The moment a few credible names move towards crypto, others will be compelled to evaluate the opportunity, explain to shareholders, and argue on why they’re ignoring it. Drivers behind the change in corporate treasury strategy There are several macro and market forces that are changing the approach of corporate treasury strategy. Inflation kills fiat Disinflation is underway, but prices are still running above pre-COVID norms around the world. Inflation in many economies is above central banks’ targets, and government deficits remain high. CFOs are wary of idle cash losing real value. Bitcoin’s fixed supply and transparent data give it credibility as a store-of-value. For company boards, the question has changed from “Why hold any BTC?” to “How much BTC, and under what policy constraints?” Clear regulations are on the horizon Two changes flipped the calculus for crypto in 2025. A new fair-value accounting rule, known as FASB ASU 2023-08, was approved this year. The rule lets companies update the value of their crypto holdings every quarter based on market prices. This approach doesn’t require companies to record losses when crypto prices fall. Reporting financials becomes clear and easy, without any internal conflicts due to accounting. Moreover, The U.S. policy over crypto has changed. The new administration has moved to end the de-banking pressure often described as “Operation Choke Point 2.0.” This means banks can serve crypto businesses as long as risks are managed. Government agencies like the SEC and FDIC followed with clear steps. The SEC repealed SAB 121, removing a major balance-sheet hurdle for bank custody. And the FDIC rescinded its prior-notice requirement for crypto activities. The Fed withdrew earlier limits. The OCC explicitly reopened the door to custody and certain stablecoin activities. Outside the U.S., regulators in Europe, the Middle East, and parts of Asia have also clarified rules on custody, tokenized assets, and disclosure. Investors demand returns The return on cash is mediocre since policy rates are easing. Companies don’t want large idle balances earning little, while equity investors ask for better deployment. Putting a small, carefully managed portion of cash into crypto could earn big gains if prices rise. Companies that clearly explain how they manage crypto risks often see their stock rise for a while. They also find it easier to raise more money later. This is sometimes called the “Saylor effect.” When a company makes a smart, clear crypto plan, it shows confidence and can spark better returns than keeping all their money in cash. Case studies about crypto treasuries The corporate crypto trend is changing. Companies are moving into Ethereum, stablecoins, and even other altcoins, beyond Bitcoin. Ethereum treasuries During the last quarter, Ethereum swept through the crypto treasury space. Across new disclosures and announcements, treasuries leaned toward ETH, often with a smaller BTC sleeve. The pace of fresh ETH allocations surpassed new BTC buys. Ether ETF flows caught up with, and in several weeks surpassed Bitcoin. Institutional desks leaned into a “yielding reserves” thesis that treats ETH staking rewards as a built-in offset to holding costs. BitMine Immersion Technologies rapidly became the largest public ETH treasury, taking its stash to roughly 2.83 million ETH. SharpLink Gaming, which framed its strategy around ETH earlier in the year, reported holdings around 838,000 ETH and continues to emphasize staking income as part of its reserve design. Together with a handful of smaller public holders, these moves shifted the center of gravity toward Ethereum in Q3. Source: StrategicETHReserve. Why is ETH good for treasurers? Ethereum has native yield. Staking ETH provides an income stream that reduces market fluctuations. ETH has settlement, tokenization, and L2 activity that corporates increasingly interact with. Clear accounting rules, and broader ETH access via ETFs or custodians lowers operational friction for ETH treasuries. BTC remains the anchor for many balance sheets. But in Q3, the marginal treasury dollar flowed faster into ETH, turning Ethereum treasuries into a huge narrative. Solana and other altcoins Ethereum is not the only chain seeing corporate buys. Forward Industries, a U.S. consumer products firm, shocked markets by purchasing roughly $1.6 billion in SOL tokens in one go. It immediately staked the SOL to earn yield across Solana’s DeFi ecosystem. Helius, a Solana treasury startup, raised $500 million to buy and stake SOL, causing its stock to jump 200% on the news. Even Bitcoin firms are branching out. Galaxy Digital, founded by Michael Novogratz, made a $300 million Solana purchase in September. Memecoins and new tokens Some companies are venturing beyond the top cryptocurrencies. CleanCore Solutions became the first company to target a Dogecoin treasury, allocating $175 million to DOGE. EightCo Holdings is raising $270 million to buy Worldcoin (WLD). Singapore’s Lion Group even plans to convert all its Sui and SOL holdings into a new token for Hyperliquid. These moves show corporate treasuries taking positions in a broad mix of cryptocurrencies, not just “blue-chip” coins or projects. Stablecoins and yield Some treasuries keep a portion of reserves in dollar-pegged tokens for yield. Stablecoin issuers, like Circle, now focus on institutional demand, offering regulated digital dollars that can sit 1:1 backed yet earn interest in DeFi protocols or cash management platforms. While specific corporate stablecoin holdings are often undisclosed, CFO interviews note that 24% of large firms expect to accept stablecoins in transactions within two years, indicating rising treasury use (Deloitte, 2025). Each of these cases, from Ethereum staking treasuries to billion-dollar Solana buys, shows that companies are treating digital assets as part of a diversified reserve strategy. Even traditional players are getting in. Crypto exchanges (Coinbase, Bitget) and mining giants (Riot, Marathon) have amassed crypto treasuries. Some legacy firms (GameStop, Tesla, Block/Square) still hold substantial Bitcoin on their books. What are the risks linked to crypto treasuries? The shift hasn’t been without controversy. Treasurers and skeptics warn of major downsides: Market risk and financing flywheels Crypto is a high-beta asset. Sharp drawdowns can hit income statements and equity values in real time under fair-value rules. For listed “treasury” names that fund purchases with new equity or convertible debt, rising token prices can create a reflexive loop: Higher stock price → more issuance → larger crypto buys. That works until it doesn’t. When the market turns, the same loop can amplify downside, stress covenants, and force unwanted de-risking at poor levels. Treasurers need position limits, liquidity buffers, and pre-agreed unwind playbooks. Oversight, controls, and audit complexity Digital assets add moving parts like key management, wallet segregation, proof-of-ownership, valuation cut-offs, staking/lending counterparty risk, and incident response if custody is compromised. Audit teams will expect clear control matrices, SOC-type assurances from custodians, and reconciliation procedures that tie on-chain records to the general ledger. Cross-border entities face uneven tax and reporting treatment, and IFRS vs. U.S. GAAP nuances still require careful policy choices. Mandate fit and shareholder alignment The Treasury’s job is security, liquidity, and predictability. A crypto sleeve can strain that mandate if size, purpose, and decision rights aren’t crystal clear. Some investors will welcome the signal of innovation; others may prefer excess cash to go to core capex, buybacks, or dividends. Clarity helps: articulate objectives (hedge, yield, strategic option), target sizing, rebalancing rules, and the thresholds that trigger a pause or reduction. A digital-asset reserve can add diversification and signaling value, but it also increases earnings volatility and operational burden. The sensible approach is incremental: small, codify guardrails, separate financing from allocation decisions, test controls with auditors, and report with the same rigor you apply to any other risk asset on the balance sheet. What could accelerate, or derail, crypto adoption next? Accelerants Broader bank-custody participation and cheaper institutional staking. More liquid and regulated stablecoin rails for B2B payments and cash management. Further clarity on staking rewards, and tax treatment. Continued ETF inflows that normalize corporate access to crypto. Headwinds A deep, multi-quarter market drawdown. Security breaches at a crypto custodian or validator pool. Policy reversals in key crypto markets or inconsistent treatment between GAAP and IFRS. In late 2025, talks inside boardrooms have changed from whether to hold digital assets to how to size, govern, and report them. If hundreds of billions of dollars flow into Bitcoin, Ether, and other reserve coins, crypto will look less like an outlier. It will become a standard line item on balance sheets by 2030. Corporate treasuries won’t have a linear path. Crypto volatility, policy changes, and audit demands will test them. The advantage will accrue to companies that treat this as a crypto treasury program with clear objectives, tight controls, and transparent disclosure.